Following the IGA’s biennial members meeting on the 5th and 6th May in Rotterdam, the Board plus a few other IGA member association advocates and myself hopped on a minibus and travelled to Leiden for the 1st International Working Group on Gaucher Disease (IWGGD) meeting.
Biljana, Sara and Kristiyan at the IGA stand |
Prof Hans Aerts was the meeting host as this is his
territory; he works at the Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University. For
the IWGGD board, led by Prof Derralynn Hughes, this was their first face to
face IWGGD meeting since the new board was appointed in 2019 in Clermont-Ferrand,
France. Since the new board was established in 2019, they have been working
hard with the development of 6 working groups, all dedicated to developing
guidelines, improving knowledge, setting standards, organising webinars, the
establishment of a new website and hosting ethical workshops with the IGA on
issues important to the Gaucher community. Members of the IGA and their members
are involved in many of the working groups and actively contributing to the
work of the IWGGD.
The IWGGD ran from the Monday 9th to Wednesday 11th
May and covered patients’ perspective, clinical spectrum; Laboratory: Genetics
and Biochemistry; New Development and Young Researchers; GBA deficiency beyond
Gaucher disease: Parkinson’s disease; Therapies and Clinic: present and future.
Each session was chaired by a member of the IWGGD. Approximately 100 delegates
attended the meeting in person, with a further 60 participating virtually from
all over the world.
Tanya presenting |
The session invited four speakers that represented four
stakeholders in the procurement process, the caregiver, the patient advocate,
the clinician, and the payer. Each of them shared their experience, the
challenges they face in the treatment procurement process and shared some
thoughts on possible solutions.
The IGA is becoming increasingly aware that the procurement
of the cheapest treatment is becoming more and more of an issue for our
community; we are aware of it happening in many countries including Peru,
Mexico, Ecuador, Iran, Columbia, and Ukraine to name a few. In some of these
cases we are talking about licensed treatments such as Cerezyme, Elelyso and
VPRIV, but also the non-comparable Abcertin/Asbroder, which is not a biosimilar
as it has not been through the biosimilar regulatory pathway.
Vesna with her volunteering poster |
As expressed by our caregiver and patient advocate, this is having an impact on their emotional, and psychological wellbeing.
Our desired outcome of this session is to seek to agree a strategy to work as a global community to provide guidance and information that can empower patients and patient advocates to communicate with their governments and pharmaceutical companies to make sure the decision makers have the information and facts to make the best decision for their community, and the patient voice is heard and involved in treatment decision making. The IGA made a call to action at the end of the session. The IGA working with the IWGGD will seek to:
- Develop switching and monitoring guidelines that can be used by patients to take to their clinicians to ensure if they are made to switch that this is done in the best and safest way possible for the patient and gives them the information to request a certain level of care, and for the clinician to use as a tool.
- A statement from the IWGGD and IGA regarding best practise for switching to empower patients/patient advocates to be able to engage in a dialogue with the health provider.
- The IGA will develop a paper on biosimilars and other non-comparable drugs such as Abcertin that outlines what they are, and an IGA statement on biosimilars, what should be considered by the patient when faced with this situation i.e., monitoring, what standards we expect to be adhered to when Governments are considering procuring biosimilars.
It was great to be around many familiar faces and friends over the 3 days. There were an increasing number of young researchers at the meeting and many of the prizes for the best poster went to these young persons, including the IGA’s award for ‘co-morbidities and a better understanding of the impact on the patient’s quality of life’.
The
vibe at the meeting was relaxed, lots of discussions, new ideas developing,
questions and issues being discussed, and collaborations being formed. During the presentations, lots of questions
were asked of the presenters and opinions shared, the atmosphere was extremely
welcoming, and the IGA and its members were welcomed and included at all
stages.
No venue was set for 2024 but the IGA will be there, and we are excited and looking forward to working with the IWGGD and its members over the next two years on multiple projects.
1 comment:
Thank you Tanya for posting your thouhts about the event... sad for not being able to attend it.
Post a Comment